|
by Julian Coleon Aug 27 |
One thing that is really pissing me off at the moment is advertising agencies claiming that they created a ‘viral’.
Do you know how stupid this sounds? It is kind of like a part time musician claiming they are a rockstar! Maybe they need a video to show them how stupid they look ;-) Check out the clip below, and if you think you can do better, get filming and send it in!
Ad agencies don’t create virals, they create content. The people decide whether it will be viral or not.
If you are going to claim viral success to journalists, instead of talking about it being ‘viral’, why not concentrate on what makes the content so remarkable. If the journalist struggles to explain how amazing the content is, how is the rest of the population going to have any chance?
Thanks to Katie Harris for that hat tip
http://zebrabites.blogspot.com/
Can't say I agree. It seems to me ad agencies can create 'virals' . It is not in the hands of the 'people'. The nature of a viral is that it is so compelling in some way that people want to spread it around - so if the ad agency gets its content right, then it will have created the viral - sure, the people are the judges as to what becomes viral, but it is the content which matters.
I would presume not.
Ad Agencies create content, you have no control over whether it will go viral or not.
On the other hand
Ad Agencies say that they create 'Television Commercials’, they don’t say they create 'Gold Cannes Awarded Winning Ads everytime' (well some do but they are better known by a word that begins with the letter ‘w’ and ends with ‘ankers’).
Advertising Agencies, especially the Australian ones could do well to learn from them.